Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint in English | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.08.03.22278363

ABSTRACT

BackgroundThe global prevalence of PASC is estimated to be present in 0{middle dot}43 and based on the WHO estimation of 470 million worldwide COVID-19 infections, corresponds to around 200 million people experiencing long COVID symptoms. Despite this, its clinical features are not well defined. MethodsWe collected retrospective data from 140 patients with PASC in a post-COVID-19 clinic on demographics, risk factors, illness severity (graded as one-mild to five-severe), functional status, and 29 symptoms and principal component symptoms cluster analysis. The Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2015 criteria were used to determine the ME/CFS phenotype. FindingsThe median age was 47 years, 59{middle dot}0% were female; 49{middle dot}3% White, 17{middle dot}2% Hispanic, 14{middle dot}9% Asian, and 6{middle dot}7% Black. Only 12{middle dot}7% required hospitalization. Seventy-two (53{middle dot}5%) patients had no known comorbid conditions. Forty-five (33{middle dot}9%) were significantly debilitated. The median duration of symptoms was 285{middle dot}5 days, and the number of symptoms was 12. The most common symptoms were fatigue (86{middle dot}5%), post-exertional malaise (82{middle dot}8%), brain fog (81{middle dot}2%), unrefreshing sleep (76{middle dot}7%), and lethargy (74{middle dot}6%). Forty-three percent fit the criteria for ME/CFS. InterpretationsMost PASC patients evaluated at our clinic had no comorbid condition and were not hospitalized for acute COVID-19. One-third of patients experienced a severe decline in their functional status. About 43% had the ME/CFS subtype. FundingThe study did not received funding.


Subject(s)
Lethargy , Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic , COVID-19 , Fatigue
2.
authorea preprints; 2021.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.161661725.56823358.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: It is unclear if asthma and its allergic phenotype are risk factors for hospitalization or severe disease from SARS-CoV-2. Methods: All patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 1 and September 30, 2020, were retrospectively identified and characterized through electronic analysis at Stanford. A sub-cohort was followed prospectively to evaluate long-term COVID-19 symptoms. Results: 168,190 patients underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing, and 6,976 (4·15%) tested positive. In a multivariate analysis, asthma was not an independent risk factor for hospitalization (OR 1·12 [95% CI 0·86, 1·45], p=0·40). Among SARS-CoV-2 positive asthmatics, allergic asthma lowered the risk of hospitalization and had a protective effect compared to non-allergic asthma (OR 0·52 (0·28, 0·91), p=0·026); there was no association between baseline medication use as characterized by GINA and hospitalization risk. Patients with severe COVID-19 disease had lower eosinophil levels during hospitalization compared to patients with mild or asymptomatic disease, independent of asthma status (p=0.0014). In a patient sub-cohort followed longitudinally, asthmatics and non-asthmatics had similar time to resolution of COVID-19 symptoms, particularly lower respiratory symptoms. Conclusions: Asthma is not a risk factor for more severe COVID-19 disease. Allergic asthmatics were half as likely to be hospitalized with COVID-19 compared to non-allergic asthmatics. Lower levels of eosinophil counts (allergic biomarkers) were associated with more severe COVID-19 disease trajectory. Recovery was similar among asthmatics and non-asthmatics with over 50% of patients reporting ongoing lower respiratory symptoms three months post-infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL